Wikipedia:Ìtọrọ láti di alámòjútó: Ìyàtọ̀ láàrin àwọn àtúnyẹ̀wò

Content deleted Content added
→‎Nomination standards: under translation
→‎Decision process: under translation
Ìlà 16:
Kò sí àwọn àbùdá fún yiyan alámòjútó, ju kí ó jẹ́ oníṣẹ́ tí àwọn olóòtù tókù lè gbẹ́kẹ̀lé. Àwùjọ máa ń wo oríṣirísi nkan lára ẹni tí ó bá máa jẹ́ alámòjútó, gbogbo ènìyàn ní ó sì ní èrò tiwọn. Fụ́n àpẹrẹ oun tí àwùjọ ń wá, wo àwọn ìtọrọ láti di alámòjútó tí ó yọrí àti àwọn tí kò yọrí.
 
==DecisionÌlànà processìpinu==
Kò sí oníṣẹ́ tí kò lè fa oníṣẹ́ míràn sílẹ̀. Ojú ewé ìfanisílẹ̀ gbọ́dọ wá ní ṣíṣí sílẹ̀ fún ọjọ́ meje gbáko, lati ọjọ́ tí wọ́n tí fi orú́kọ sílẹ̀. Ní àwọn àkókò yìí, àwọn oníṣẹ́ máa sọ èrò wọn, bèrè ìbéérè, tí wọn á sì dá sí ọ̀rọ̀. Ìjìròrò yìí kìí ṣe ìbò (nígbàmíràn, wọ́n máa ń pèé ní !ìbò, wọ́n máa ń lo àmì ẹ̀rọ computer). Ní ìparí, oníṣẹ́ kan tí wọ́n ń pè ní bureaucrat yìó yẹ ìjíròrò yìí wò lati ri bóyá wọ́n gbà lati fi oníṣẹ́ tí ó fẹ́ si alámòjútó sí ìpò alámòjútó. Nígbàmíràn ó máa ń ṣòro wọ̀n àti pé kìí ṣe ìwọ̀n oǹkà, ṣùgbọ́n gẹ́gẹ́ bí ìlànà, tí bíi ~80% bá ti faramọ, ó yege nìyẹn; tí ó bá kéré sí bíi ~70%, kìí sábà yọrí, bureaucratic sì máa fòye gbée.
Any user may nominate another user with an account. Nominations remain posted for seven days from the time the nomination is posted on this page, during which time users give their opinions, ask questions, and make comments. This discussion process is not a vote (it is sometimes referred to as a !vote, using the computer science negation symbol). At the end of that period, a bureaucrat will review the discussion to see whether there is a consensus for promotion. This is sometimes difficult to ascertain and is not a numerical measurement, but as a general descriptive rule of thumb most of those above ~80% approval pass; most of those below ~70% fail, and the area between is subject to bureaucratic discretion.
 
 
Bureaucrats may also use their discretion to close nominations early, if a promotion is unlikely and they see no further benefit in leaving the application open. Only bureaucrats may close a nomination as a definitive promotion, but any user in good standing can close a request that has no chance of passing; please do not close any requests that you have taken part in, or that are not blatantly unpassable. In the case of vandalism, improper formatting or a declined or withdrawn nomination, non-bureaucrats may also delist a nomination, but they should make sure they leave a note with the candidate, and if necessary add the request to the unsuccessful requests.
Line 24 ⟶ 25:
 
Self-nominations are permitted. If you are unsure about nominating yourself for adminship, you may wish to consult admin coaching first, so as to get an idea of what the community might think of your request. Also, you might explore adoption by a more experienced user to gain experience.
 
==Expressing opinions==
Any Wikipedian with an account is welcome to comment in the Support, Oppose, and Neutral sections, but IPs are unable to place a numerical (#) "vote". The candidate may respond to the comments of others. Certain comments may be discounted if there are suspicions of fraud; these may be the contributions of very new editors, sockpuppets, and meatpuppets. Please explain your opinion by including a short explanation of your reasoning. Your input (positive or negative) will carry more weight if supported by evidence. In close nominations, detailed explanations behind your position will have more impact than positions with no explanations or simple comments such as "yep", "no way" and "as per."